Co-funded by the European Union
Open by Designassessment in the age of generative AI

Start · about 15 minutes

Bring one assessment

Everything in this course is about one assessment you know well. Choose it first, then try your hand at marking four exam answers.

§01 Worksheet · your assessment

Which assessment will you bring?

Choose one in a course you teach or are responsible for, and keep to that one even if the course has several. You come back to it at the end of every step.

§02 Activity

Can you tell?

Four students answered the same take-home question, and all four used AI somewhere along the way. Each of them worked differently. We have reconstructed their answers with AI, following how each student worked, so the texts are realistic but not real.

Read them as you would when marking. Give each answer a mark, and guess which way of working produced it.

This activity needs JavaScript.

Sources

  • Dawson, P., Bearman, M., Dollinger, M. and Boud, D. (2024). Validity matters more than cheating. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2024.2386662
  • Fawns, T., Boud, D. and Dawson, P. (2026). Identifying what our students have learned: a framework for practical assessment validation. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2026.2620053
  • Scarfe, P., Watcham, K., Clarke, A. and Roesch, E. (2024). A real-world test of artificial intelligence infiltration of a university examinations system. PLOS ONE. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0305354

The exam case draws on Hardin (1968), “The tragedy of the commons”, Science, and Ostrom (1990), Governing the Commons, Cambridge University Press.

Your assessment